AI Literacy
How to spot a hallucination before it spots you
Five practical tells that an AI answer is fabricated, written for non-technical readers who want to trust their tools without being burned by them.
Hallucinations are not random. They follow patterns. Once you know the patterns, you can read an AI answer the same way an editor reads a press release — fast, alert, and quietly suspicious of the most fluent sentences.
Why fluency is the trap
The instinct most people apply to AI answers is the wrong one: if it sounds confident, it must be right. In practice, the opposite is more useful — if it sounds suspiciously polished on a topic where you would normally see hedging, slow down.
[Migration in progress — full article body to be brought across from the original Notion source.]
Five tells
- Specific numbers without a source. Real expertise hedges.
- Quotes attributed to named people. Verify, always.
- Citations that read like real citations but don’t resolve. A common failure mode.
- Smooth transitions between unrelated facts. Models love coherence, even fake coherence.
- A confident answer to a question with no public answer. That’s not knowledge — that’s confabulation.
Keep reading
AI Literacy • 2 Oct 2025 • EN
When should you start a new AI chat, and when should you continue?
The context window is a finite resource. Knowing when to reset and when to carry on is one of the highest-leverage skills in AI literacy.
AI Literacy • 4 Sept 2025 • EN
Why the way you write your prompt changes everything
A non-technical deep-dive into attention, context, and why the same model gives radically different answers to almost-identical questions.
AI Literacy • 12 Aug 2025 • EN
Not all languages are equal for AI
Tokenization is not neutral. French costs more tokens than English for the same idea, and that has direct consequences for cost, latency, and quality.